<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a brand survive with a bad logo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bowleydesign.com/our-thoughts/can-a-brand-survive-with-a-bad-logo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bowleydesign.com/our-thoughts/can-a-brand-survive-with-a-bad-logo</link>
	<description>Big thinking from a small company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bowleydesign.com/our-thoughts/can-a-brand-survive-with-a-bad-logo/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bowleydesign.com/?p=333#comment-3</guid>
		<description>A very good point Dave. Google wasn&#039;t competing with a massively dominant market leader when they started though - they were largely &#039;trail-blazing&#039; in an industry that empowered its users like never before. That kind of thing almost builds a brand in itself, regardless of design. By the way, I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/startups/multimedia/2008/02/gallery_google_logos?slide=1&amp;slideView=6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this interesting article&lt;/a&gt; about the design of the Google logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good point Dave. Google wasn&#8217;t competing with a massively dominant market leader when they started though &#8211; they were largely &#8216;trail-blazing&#8217; in an industry that empowered its users like never before. That kind of thing almost builds a brand in itself, regardless of design. By the way, I found <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/startups/multimedia/2008/02/gallery_google_logos?slide=1&amp;slideView=6" rel="nofollow">this interesting article</a> about the design of the Google logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.bowleydesign.com/our-thoughts/can-a-brand-survive-with-a-bad-logo/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bowleydesign.com/?p=333#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, 

As you know, I&#039;m a bit of a design terrorist, but I wonder if the Google logo is anymore powerful than the Bing one. 

If Google and Bing both launched as new logos today, would either of them earn compliments from designers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, </p>
<p>As you know, I&#8217;m a bit of a design terrorist, but I wonder if the Google logo is anymore powerful than the Bing one. </p>
<p>If Google and Bing both launched as new logos today, would either of them earn compliments from designers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
